I have studied Graham style contemporary for the last six or seven years. I then went on to college to find a whole new description of “contemporary” as Urdang taught the Cuningham style. It is interesting that Graham asked Cunningham to be a dancer in her company and therefore passed down her style through him, consciously or subconsciously. The way contemporary dance has developed is largely dependent on the work of these two choreographers.
A link of interest http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2008/sep/16/mercecunningham.dance
I found this style much faster, with more travelling steps and different back techniques used. I liked it, though it was challenging in a different way to Graham's style, which I think is more strength and core based in ways, though their techniques cross over frequently.
From this experience, I have concluded that there is more to contemporary than meets the eye and everyone's idea of contemporary can be very different. Unlike ballet, it is a very versatile and flexible style of dance, which can be performed in entirely different ways. It was the beginning of the post-modern era, taking and recycling old styles and reforming them as a collage of ideas of eclectic styles. Contemporary has the same basic idea of expression, but dancers and choreographers will take their impression of the style and continue to create new ideas.
With my own choreography I would like to try and mix both Graham and Cunningham together, from what I have been taught uses both styles, therefore I undoubtedly am influenced by both.
